Trump's lawyers nevertheless filed their motion late Friday. "There is no way I am going to grant that," Engoron said on Tuesday. Judge Arthur Engoron all but guaranteed he would deny the request to end the trial when Trump's lawyer Chris Kise announced his plans to file the motion earlier this week. "Defendants are once again 'whistling past the graveyard' by relying on arguments the Court has already rejected," Amer said, referring in part to Engoron's pretrial partial summary judgment ruling, in which he found that Trump used fraudulent statements to conduct business.ĭec 15, 6:27 PM EST Trump files 5th motion for directed verdict Link Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Email this articleĭonald Trump's lawyers made their fifth motion for a directed verdict in the former president's fraud trial in a filing late Friday that appears destined to be rejected. "Unlike a fine Bordeaux, Defendants' case for a directed verdict does not improve with age," state attorney Andrew Amer wrote in Monday's letter to the judge.Īmer also argued that Trump's request was not merited given the evidence presented at trial, saying that "Nor does any of the testimony from the most ineffective team of experts that Defendants' money can buy change the analysis." The judge has rejected all four of Trump's previous motions for a directed verdict. Trump's lawyers on Friday made their fifth motion for a directed verdict to end the case for lack of evidence, which Engoron earlier said he was all but certain to deny. Trump, his co-defendants, and their counsel with sound bites for press conferences, Truth Social posts, and cable news appearances." In a letter the Judge Arthur Engoron, a lawyer for the New York attorney general said Donald Trump's most recent request for a directed verdict in the case is nothing more than a "political stunt designed to provide Mr. 11.ĭec 18, 4:56 PM EST Trump's case does not age like fine wine, NY AG lawyer says Link Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Email this article The judge ended his ruling by reminding the parties about the date for closing arguments in the case, currently set for Jan. "That the instant lenders made millions of dollars and were happy with the transactions does not mean that they were not damaged by lending at lower interest rates than they otherwise would have," he wrote.Ĭalling Trump's claims "misstatements at best and fraud at worst," Engoron wrote that "Valuations, as elucidated ad nauseum in this trial, can be based on different criteria analyzed in different ways. All that §63(12) requires is a false statement used in business the subject financial statements fit that definition 'to a T,'" Engoron wrote.Įngoron also suggested he didn't buy Trump's argument that fining the former president for ill-gotten gains was not merited in the case because his lenders were happy with the transactions. "Closing is not a get-out-of-jail-free card for future misstatements. The judge also rejected assertions from Trump's lawyers that any financial misstatements are beyond the case's statute of limitations. "Bartov is a tenured professor, but all that his testimony proves is that for a million or so dollars, some experts will say whatever you want them to say," Engoron wrote. In a blistering ruling, the judge not only denied the motion but also opted to explain the flaws he sees in many of Trump's arguments at trial.Īddressing the testimony of defense accounting expert Eli Bartov, who Trump proudly and repeatedly declared found " no accounting fraud of any kind," Engoron flatly dismissed Bartov's findings by saying he lost credibility by "doggedly attempting to justify every misstatement." Judge Arthur Engoron has denied Donald Trump's most recent motion for a directed verdict to end his civil fraud trial. Dec 18, 5:17 PM EST In blistering ruling, judge denies Trump's motion for directed verdict Link Share to Facebook Share to Twitter Email this article
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |